Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32765

in Oviedo, FloridaPopulation 64,477

63.46/ 100

Ranked #2,726 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.6%)

Ranked #87 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 9.0%)

Ranked #11 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

181.3 days/year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

921 units

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.1%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.2%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.7%

in the bottom 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 32765, one of several in Oviedo, Florida, by its overall standing, sits in the top 8.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,726th) and the top 9.0% of Florida (87th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled radon rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat sits in the top 1.7% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk registers in the top 10.2% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 10.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 32766, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $102,167 predicts 80.2 years — 2.0 years above.

    Ranked #944 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.4 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.9 years — 3.2 years above them.

    Ranked #689 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.8%18.5–23.2
High blood pressure among adults29.1%26.0–32.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Depression among adults17.0%14.5–19.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.4–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%30.3–37.3
Obesity among adults27.5%22.7–32.8
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.7%7.1–10.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.5–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.9–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.8–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.5–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%63.0–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%62.0–68.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%71.4–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.4–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.7%15.9–21.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%29.0–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.7–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Any disability among adults25.0%21.9–28.3
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Mobility disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate71.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$102,167$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$447,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,874$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured