Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32443

in Greenwood, FloridaPopulation 2,879

39.33/ 100

Ranked #27,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #894 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.60%

in the bottom 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

13.5%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152 days/year

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21 mi

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

19.5 mi

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Greenwood, Florida (ZIP 32443) stands in the bottom 15% nationally (27,181st) and the bottom 8.3% of Florida (894th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 0.01% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 3.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 5.1% nationally. Working the other way, modeled nitrate sits in the top 2.7% nationally, stroke resides in the top 4.1% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the top 5.9% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the top 4.2% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the top 6.1% nationally.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 32442, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 71.2; chronic-disease standing 9.2 (bottom 10%) — 62 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,590 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.6–36.1
High blood pressure among adults47.2%43.3–51.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%10.0–12.8
Depression among adults18.9%16.3–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.4%17.1–21.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.3–44.1
Obesity among adults42.3%36.5–48.5
Stroke among adults6.0%5.4–6.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.2%17.7–25.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.0%12.5–17.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.2–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.4–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.0–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.4%56.6–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.7%38.4–45.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.3–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.1–14.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%17.0–22.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%29.5–39.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.2%37.9–48.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.7%25.2–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.0–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.1–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.5–19.7
Any disability among adults40.4%35.7–44.7
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.3
Independent living disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.7
Mobility disability among adults23.1%20.3–25.7
Self-care disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)9.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households64.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+26.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age45.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$47,663$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$127,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$870$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured