Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32244

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 63,592

48.69/ 100

Ranked #18,094 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #629 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #43 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,609 units

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

33.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

168.6 days/year

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.1 mi

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.9%

in the bottom 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 32244, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,094th) and the bottom 35% of Florida (629th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled transportation noise rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and short sleep is in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 11.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the top 12.9% nationally. On the stronger side, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 0.5% nationally, park land registers in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled radon sits in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 11.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 32065, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.6 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $62,204 predicts 78.2 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,664 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.6–27.7
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.0–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.7–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Depression among adults19.9%17.3–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.2–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.9%30.6–37.2
Obesity among adults36.4%31.5–41.4
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.0%13.3–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.2%13.5–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%72.1–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%73.1–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.9–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%60.9–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.0%47.7–54.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%70.3–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.5–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.8–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%26.1–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%40.3–49.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%20.3–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.6–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.7–17.9
Any disability among adults32.8%29.4–36.3
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.5–16.8
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate56.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population12.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households41.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age34.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$62,204$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$241,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,470$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.46 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured