Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32277

in Jacksonville, FloridaPopulation 36,338

47.47/ 100

Ranked #19,585 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #674 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #46 of 60 Jacksonville, FL ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

898 units

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

156.5 days/year

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

43.5%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

38.7%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

50.9%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

5.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 32277, one of several in Jacksonville, Florida comes out in the bottom 39% nationally (19,585th) and the bottom 31% of Florida (674th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled short sleep stands in the top 3.1% nationally, modeled humid heat lands in the top 3.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the top 6.6% nationally, floodplain exposure rests in the top 6.7% nationally, and homeownership lies in the bottom 9.6% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled radon settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 11.8% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 11.9% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 32225, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jacksonville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.1–27.1
High blood pressure among adults35.5%32.4–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.9–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.0%29.8–36.2
Obesity among adults36.2%31.4–41.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.3%14.5–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.1%13.4–17.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.2%71.5–76.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.9–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%81.2–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%60.6–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.5%46.3–52.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%69.6–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.5–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%26.0–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults45.0%40.2–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%20.4–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.4–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.4–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.4–18.9
Any disability among adults33.7%30.2–37.3
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults14.9%13.3–16.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6420.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)12.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate50.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population13.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households35.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age31.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$61,554$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$283,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,378$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured