Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32053

in Jennings, FloridaPopulation 4,000

27.56/ 100

Ranked #31,164 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.9%)

Ranked #971 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 0.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

59.6%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.9%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.8%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

21.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Jennings, Florida (ZIP 32053) ranks in the bottom 2.9% nationally (31,164th) and the bottom 0.4% of Florida (971st).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled mammography stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 2.1% nationally, and stroke resides in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 2.0% nationally, independent living disability registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 2.5% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 1.7% nationally, and uninsured stands in the top 3.5% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 31636, just across the boundary. Modeled stroke stands in the top 1.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 87.4; chronic-disease standing 1.5 (bottom 10%) — 86 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #243 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%32.6–39.5
High blood pressure among adults48.3%44.1–52.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults12.4%11.1–13.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
Depression among adults20.8%17.7–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.6%19.1–24.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.7%42.5–50.9
Obesity among adults44.4%37.5–51.4
Stroke among adults6.7%6.2–7.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.7%24.6–32.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.7%18.8–24.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.2–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.7–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.3–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.8%50.4–61.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.7%40.3–47.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years59.6%50.3–68.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.3–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.9%20.7–27.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.6%32.5–42.6
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%35.7–48.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.4%31.5–39.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.1–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults22.0%19.5–24.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.8%18.5–23.5
Any disability among adults46.1%41.3–51.0
Hearing disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Independent living disability among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Mobility disability among adults26.8%23.8–30.0
Self-care disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Vision disability among adults12.0%10.8–13.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6427.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription78.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population6.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$44,519$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$103,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$876$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 2.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.03 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured