Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31805

in Cusseta, GeorgiaPopulation 1,833

37.00/ 100

Ranked #28,527 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.1%)

Ranked #628 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 11.7%)

Ranked #29 of 36 Columbus, GA-AL ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

103.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

134.8 days/year

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.0%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.9%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Cusseta, Georgia (ZIP 31805) stands in the bottom 11.1% nationally (28,527th) and the bottom 11.7% of Georgia (628th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: fatal road crashes settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled tooth loss rests in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and diabetes settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 7.4% nationally, humid heat lands in the top 8.6% nationally, and utility shutoff settles in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled obesity rests in the top 6.5% nationally, high blood pressure lands in the top 8.7% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 9.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, fatal road crashes runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 31803, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, GA-AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 67.3; chronic-disease standing 10.4 — 57 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,959 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.7–35.8
High blood pressure among adults46.5%42.1–51.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Depression among adults21.4%18.1–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.5%16.3–20.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.5–45.5
Obesity among adults43.9%35.5–52.9
Stroke among adults5.3%4.9–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.2%26.7–36.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.4–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.9–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.5–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.0–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%54.6–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.9%38.3–45.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.2–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%10.5–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%16.9–23.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.5%29.3–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults44.0%36.7–51.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.7%24.3–31.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.1–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
Any disability among adults38.1%33.5–43.0
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Independent living disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Mobility disability among adults20.6%18.0–23.2
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.8–29.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.8%21.5–28.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.7%20.5–27.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.8%16.4–21.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.4–14.8
Loneliness among adults36.9%31.8–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.2–16.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6415.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate80.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households56.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+21.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$56,544$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$103,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$796$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.7 yr ± 2.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.01 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured