Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31320

in Midway, GeorgiaPopulation 10,794

48.90/ 100

Ranked #17,800 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #307 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 43%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Hinesville, GA metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

57%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

12.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

141.8 days/year

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, Midway, Georgia (ZIP 31320) ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (17,800th) and the top 43% of Georgia (307th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other side, floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the top 6.9% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 9.5% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers in the top 12.0% nationally, unemployment rests in the top 12.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the top 13.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness lies in the top 13.7% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 31309, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hinesville, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.1 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $77,195 predicts 79.1 years — 3.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,035 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%25.8–32.5
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.4–46.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Depression among adults20.0%17.1–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.8–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%35.5–44.2
Obesity among adults32.5%25.7–39.7
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.6–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.4–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.0–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.8–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.0–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%61.5–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.4–60.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.3–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.8–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.9%24.4–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%30.9–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%19.3–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Any disability among adults32.7%28.5–37.0
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.7–29.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.1–20.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.1–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%13.0–17.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Loneliness among adults36.7%31.6–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6415.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$77,195$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$234,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,024$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.1 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured