Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31082

in Sandersville, GeorgiaPopulation 10,236

38.00/ 100

Ranked #28,021 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.7%)

Ranked #608 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

13.0%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.6%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.6%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.3%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.9%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Sandersville, Georgia (ZIP 31082) sits in the bottom 12.7% nationally (28,021st) and the bottom 14.5% of Georgia (608th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 5.3% nationally, childcare stands in the top 7.5% nationally, and grocery resides in the top 7.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled energy burden sits in the top 0.2% nationally, diabetes stands in the top 4.4% nationally, and self-care disability resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 5.5% nationally, and tooth loss sits in the top 7.4% nationally.

Put plainly, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 31018, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.0 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $57,308 predicts 77.9 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,459 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 67.6; chronic-disease standing 10.4 — 57 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,939 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.9–36.0
High blood pressure among adults48.3%44.0–52.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Depression among adults19.8%16.8–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.6%17.3–22.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.5–45.5
Obesity among adults42.8%34.7–51.3
Stroke among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.9%20.9–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.3–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.1%79.8–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.7–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.3–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%59.9–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.5%46.7–54.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%64.8–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.5–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.2–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.2%30.4–40.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%35.2–49.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.7%25.7–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.6–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.4
Any disability among adults38.3%33.9–43.0
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.9
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.3–14.0
Mobility disability among adults21.6%19.2–24.2
Self-care disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Vision disability among adults8.7%8.0–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.2%23.3–31.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.1%23.6–30.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.2%22.1–28.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.9–23.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.6%12.0–15.4
Loneliness among adults39.6%33.9–45.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.7–16.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6424.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)10.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate63.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households37.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age37.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$57,308$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$121,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$865$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured