Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

30413

in Bartow, GeorgiaPopulation 1,362

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

37.94/ 100

Ranked #28,041 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.6%)

Ranked #609 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 14.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

6.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.3%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.74 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.9%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.1%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bartow, Georgia (ZIP 30413), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 12.6% nationally (28,041st) and the bottom 14.4% of Georgia (609th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled stroke registers in the top 2.5% nationally, diabetes is in the top 3.4% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 3.5% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 4.9% nationally, and loneliness lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled independent living disability registers in the top 6.4% nationally, and tooth loss is in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the top 7.2% nationally. On the better side, pharmacy registers in the top 2.1% nationally.

The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 30434, just across the boundary. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 4.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 91.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 5.2 (bottom 10%) — 87 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #223 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.8–37.9
High blood pressure among adults49.9%46.5–53.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.3–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.1–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.7–11.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.6–13.0
Depression among adults19.9%17.5–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.3%18.4–22.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%40.0–47.4
Obesity among adults40.3%34.0–47.1
Stroke among adults6.4%5.9–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.4%22.5–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.1%14.0–18.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.3%81.3–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.4–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.9–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%58.4–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.6%46.7–53.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%66.3–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%10.1–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%17.8–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.2%33.1–41.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%34.6–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.5%27.8–33.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.6–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.9%17.2–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.4–20.0
Any disability among adults41.7%38.0–45.8
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.9–10.7
Independent living disability among adults13.1%11.9–14.4
Mobility disability among adults24.0%21.8–26.4
Self-care disability among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.4–9.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.7%24.7–30.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.6%23.0–28.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.6–25.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.7–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.4–14.0
Loneliness among adults40.1%36.0–44.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)18.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle8.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription86.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households71.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+40.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age60.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$68,558$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$122,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$805$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured