Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31081

in Rupert, GeorgiaPopulation 203

23.88/ 100

Ranked #31,572 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)

Ranked #707 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

50.4%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

10.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

31.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

60.9%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

38.5%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.3%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Rupert, Georgia (ZIP 31081) lands in the bottom 1.6% nationally (31,572nd) and the bottom 0.6% of Georgia (707th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled tooth loss registers in the top 0.06% nationally, and self-care disability rests in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 0.6% nationally, and stroke lies in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 0.3% nationally, vision disability sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and diabetes is in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, fair or poor health resides in the top 1.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the top 0.6% nationally.

For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 31006, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. Modeled stroke registers in the top 0.4% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.7%37.7–45.3
High blood pressure among adults53.0%48.4–57.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults13.3%11.5–15.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults18.6%15.1–22.1
Depression among adults23.6%20.0–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.2%21.1–27.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.9%42.2–51.1
Obesity among adults43.4%34.8–51.0
Stroke among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years50.4%44.8–55.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.9%13.9–22.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%82.3–86.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.6–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.1–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%55.4–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults35.1%31.9–38.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years60.9%51.9–69.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.3%8.4–12.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.3%22.3–32.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.7%38.0–51.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%33.3–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults38.5%32.7–44.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.4%17.8–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults24.2%20.7–27.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.7%18.3–25.3
Any disability among adults48.2%42.1–54.2
Hearing disability among adults12.7%11.0–14.4
Independent living disability among adults18.0%14.9–21.1
Mobility disability among adults31.4%26.6–36.1
Self-care disability among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Vision disability among adults12.7%10.6–14.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.2–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.1%25.9–38.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.6%28.1–41.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.6%16.2–23.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.7–17.9
Loneliness among adults36.2%30.6–41.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.6–17.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population12.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age38.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$133,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.7 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 74.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured