Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31037

in McRae-Helena, GeorgiaPopulation 3,828

42.14/ 100

Ranked #25,093 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #509 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

41.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.4%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

22.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.2%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

15.1 mi

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.3%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.4%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.2%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 31037, one of several in McRae-Helena, Georgia, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 22% nationally (25,093rd) and the bottom 28% of Georgia (509th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 8.0% nationally. By contrast, modeled loneliness rests in the top 2.0% nationally, uninsured lies in the top 5.0% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the top 6.3% nationally, and tooth loss registers in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the top 7.8% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the top 8.3% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the top 8.4% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 31009, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.6%20.5–24.8
High blood pressure among adults39.5%36.1–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Depression among adults18.6%16.3–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.6–38.0
Obesity among adults40.6%34.1–47.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.2%21.2–27.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.4%16.2–23.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%68.5–73.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.9–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults80.5%77.9–82.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.3%53.4–61.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.4%44.2–50.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%64.3–76.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.6–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%18.1–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%28.6–37.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.9%38.1–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%23.4–29.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.0–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.9–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.7–21.1
Any disability among adults35.9%31.9–40.1
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.8–7.0
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Mobility disability among adults15.5%14.0–17.2
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.4%28.6–36.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.4%23.7–31.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.7%19.4–26.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.2%19.3–25.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
Loneliness among adults41.9%37.0–46.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.4–16.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6423.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)24.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription74.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate71.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households47.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$55,794$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$58,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$912$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured