ZIP code
30807
in Camak, GeorgiaPopulation 186
41.44/ 100
Ranked #25,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)
Ranked #529 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 26%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.0%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
3.1%
in the bottom 4.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
13.0%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
18.7%
in the top 6.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
24.9%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
38.6%
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
47.1%
in the top 7.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
1.8%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›The read
Camak, Georgia (ZIP 30807), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 20% nationally (25,710th) and the bottom 26% of Georgia (529th).
A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: unemployment lands in the top 5.3% nationally, modeled diabetes rests in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled tooth loss settles in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 7.0% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 7.5% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.
Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 30824, about 2.6 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 63%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 54%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 49%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 15%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 30%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Disability
healthier than 19%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 38%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 69%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 49%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 43%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 18%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 21%
11%
Disability
healthier than 30%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 39%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
30821
Georgiashares a border
Score 40.61
Closest healthier
30824
Georgiaabout 2.6 mi away
Score 44.98
Similar health profile
42078
Kentucky98% similar profile
Score 33.86
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.4% | 27.6–35.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.1% | 42.3–51.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.5% | 6.7–8.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 9.9–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.1% | 7.1–9.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.7% | 8.1–11.4 |
| Depression among adults | 20.2% | 16.9–23.9 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.7% | 16.1–21.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 40.2% | 35.3–45.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.9% | 33.7–52.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.2% | 4.6–5.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.9% | 20.7–29.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 15.2% | 12.0–19.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.2% | 78.1–83.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.2% | 76.4–83.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.4% | 85.1–89.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.8% | 55.5–65.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 49.8% | 46.0–53.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.7% | 66.6–81.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.3% | 9.8–15.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.6% | 16.2–23.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 34.5% | 28.5–40.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.4% | 34.1–49.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.3% | 23.2–31.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.4% | 16.1–20.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 17.1% | 14.7–19.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.9% | 14.4–19.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.0% | 31.6–42.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.5% | 6.5–8.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.4% | 9.7–13.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.3% | 17.1–23.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.3–7.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.7% | 6.6–8.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.4% | 23.1–32.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.6% | 20.0–29.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 21.7% | 17.6–26.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.0% | 16.0–22.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 10.3–14.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 38.6% | 32.6–44.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 10.9–14.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 3.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 13.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 76.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 3.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 89.1% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 8.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 38.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $65,405 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $13,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 72.2 yr ± 0.77 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 72.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured