ZIP code
30222
in Greenville, GeorgiaPopulation 4,797
40.40/ 100
Ranked #26,477 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #560 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranked #200 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
19.4%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.8%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.7%
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
47.7%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.8%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
42.2%
in the top 8.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
12.3%
in the top 9.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST81stUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Obesity
43%
in the top 9.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Walkability
2.8 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 13.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST8thUS14thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
4.5%
in the top 17% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS83rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›The read
Greenville, Georgia (ZIP 30222), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,477th) and the bottom 21% of Georgia (560th).
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally. On the other hand, modeled diabetes settles in the top 4.8% nationally, self-care disability stands in the top 6.8% nationally, and stroke is in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability registers in the top 9.8% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the top 10.1% nationally, and vision disability lies in the top 10.1% nationally.
A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 30218, just across the boundary. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 6.5% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 45%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 55%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 43%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 52%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 14%
11%
Disability
healthier than 12%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 70%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 67%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 50%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 41%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 15%
11%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 1.0%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 4%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 24%
8%
Disability
healthier than 1%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 28%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 78.7; chronic-disease standing 10.5 — 68 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #1,179 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
30218
Georgiashares a border
Score 45.85
Closest healthier
30220
Georgiashares a border
Score 50.27
Similar health profile
31825
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 36.54
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.8% | 31.1–34.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.7% | 45.8–49.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.3% | 7.8–8.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.3% | 10.6–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.0% | 8.4–9.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 9.9–11.6 |
| Depression among adults | 19.9% | 18.4–21.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.4% | 18.2–20.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.2% | 39.2–43.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.0% | 39.7–46.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.7% | 5.4–6.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.7% | 18.1–25.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.8% | 13.3–16.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.4% | 81.1–83.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.8% | 79.2–82.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.1% | 86.1–88.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 60.1–70.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 51.1% | 47.3–54.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.1% | 69.7–83.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.8% | 10.7–12.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.7% | 18.1–21.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.5% | 34.1–39.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.2% | 35.0–49.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.4% | 26.6–30.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.5% | 17.3–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.0% | 16.9–19.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.3% | 16.1–18.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.4% | 36.1–40.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.3% | 7.7–8.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.3% | 11.4–13.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 21.8% | 20.4–23.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.8% | 6.3–7.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.4% | 7.9–8.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.3% | 23.3–31.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.9% | 21.7–28.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.9% | 20.0–25.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 16.5–21.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 10.9–14.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.6% | 31.8–43.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.0% | 11.3–14.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 18.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 19.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 19.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 13.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 7.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 79.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 18.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 71.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 56.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 19.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 42.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $64,151 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $137,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | $874 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.8 yr ± 0.59 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured