Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

30666

in Statham, GeorgiaPopulation 10,585

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

55.43/ 100

Ranked #8,951 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #145 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #97 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.3 per million

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Statham, Georgia (ZIP 30666) ranks in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,951st) and the top 20% of Georgia (145th).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 14.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 25% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 7.2% nationally, humid heat lands in the top 13.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 14.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the top 18% nationally. Childcare settles at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 30549, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.5 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $95,000 predicts 79.9 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,590 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.3 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.5 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #1,574 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%24.4–29.3
High blood pressure among adults36.7%33.5–39.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.6–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Depression among adults19.9%17.5–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%35.1–41.7
Obesity among adults33.8%28.3–39.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.8–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.9–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.6–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%75.2–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.8–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.2–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.2–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%69.3–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%13.1–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%22.3–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%30.8–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.6–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%15.0–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.1–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.5–15.5
Any disability among adults29.0%25.9–32.1
Hearing disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.2%11.8–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.7–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.2–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Loneliness among adults35.9%31.5–40.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.5–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6415.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)10.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription94.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate85.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population9.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households52.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$95,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$316,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,553$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured