Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29435

in Cottageville, South CarolinaPopulation 4,304

37.70/ 100

Ranked #28,191 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.1%)

Ranked #372 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 10.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.8%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.9%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.7%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.9%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

68.9%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Cottageville, South Carolina (ZIP 29435) sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally (28,191st) and the bottom 10.8% of South Carolina (372nd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: fiber broadband lies in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 3.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled self-care disability is in the top 6.8% nationally, modeled diabetes lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and crowded housing registers in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the top 8.9% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 9.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure registers in the top 9.6% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 11.0% nationally.

Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 29437, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 13.1 — 82 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #394 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%31.1–37.7
High blood pressure among adults44.2%40.3–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.5–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
Depression among adults24.8%21.5–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%16.0–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.5–43.6
Obesity among adults39.5%32.8–46.2
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.8%17.8–24.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.3–16.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.2–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.1–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.0–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.9–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.5%49.8–57.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.9%61.0–76.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.7–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.2%18.6–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.2%29.8–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.0–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.1%24.9–31.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.9–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.7–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
Any disability among adults37.8%33.7–42.1
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Mobility disability among adults21.6%19.2–24.1
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%22.2–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.2%22.0–28.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.4–20.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.9–19.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Loneliness among adults32.4%27.8–37.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6425.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)19.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription86.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate89.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households44.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$58,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$168,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$922$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.1 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 72.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured