ZIP code
29372
in Pacolet, South CarolinaPopulation 3,552
45.03/ 100
Ranked #22,371 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)
Ranked #248 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 41%)
Ranked #23 of 36 Spartanburg, SC ZIPs (bottom 36%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Industrial-pollution burden
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Grocery access
0.23 per 1,000 residents
in the top 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
39 per million
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.5%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
1.6 mi
in the bottom 9.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST13thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
56.6%
in the top 9.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Pacolet, South Carolina (ZIP 29372) ranks in the bottom 30% nationally (22,371st) and the bottom 41% of South Carolina (248th).
The measures split the difference for this area: grocery registers in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the top 13.9% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 5.1% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 7.4% nationally. Slow internet speeds stands in the top 7.4% nationally, distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the top 9.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 13.6% nationally, and household income lands in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.
In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 29302, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Spartanburg, SC metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 30%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 14%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 32%
8%
Disability
healthier than 29%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 39%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 39%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 51%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 50%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 42%
11%
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 10%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 24%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 60%
13%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 49%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 46%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 54%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 23%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 37%
16%
Disability
healthier than 37%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 14%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
29302
South Carolinashares a border
Score 51.29
Closest healthier
29307
South Carolinashares a border
Score 51.66
Similar health profile
37218
Tennessee96% similar profile
Score 39.76
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.4% | 30.2–34.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.6% | 39.0–44.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.6–10.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.1% | 9.2–11.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.9% | 7.2–8.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.4% | 8.5–10.5 |
| Depression among adults | 24.7% | 22.3–27.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.2% | 13.8–16.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.2% | 38.4–43.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.5% | 34.4–42.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.5% | 4.2–4.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 15.8% | 13.7–18.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.6% | 10.8–14.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.5% | 79.6–83.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.7% | 77.3–81.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.9% | 84.4–87.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 67.1% | 63.8–70.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.0% | 56.3–61.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.9% | 73.5–82.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.3% | 13.4–17.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 16.3% | 14.6–18.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 29.6% | 26.7–32.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 37.7% | 34.1–41.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.2% | 21.0–25.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.8% | 16.2–19.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.2% | 14.8–17.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.6% | 15.1–18.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 37.1% | 34.1–40.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.4–8.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 9.2–11.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.5% | 16.8–20.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.9% | 4.5–5.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.7–6.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.7% | 23.1–28.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.5% | 16.3–20.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 9.8–13.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.5% | 12.0–15.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.9% | 8.0–9.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 30.1–36.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.8% | 7.9–9.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 15.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 12.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 16.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 20.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.3% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410 |
| Broadband subscription | 78.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 18.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410 |
| Homeownership rate | 80.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419 |
| Single-parent households | 53.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 24.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419 |
| Median age | 48.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415 |
| Median household income | $46,739 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384 |
| Median home value | $104,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383 |
| Median gross rent | $746 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $950 ($678–$1,545) n=343 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.2 yr ± 0.96 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured