Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28577

in Sealevel, North CarolinaPopulation 318

45.11/ 100

Ranked #22,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #577 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

78.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

23.9 mi

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.9%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.2 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.2 mi

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.4%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.0%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sealevel, North Carolina (ZIP 28577), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 30% nationally (22,290th) and the bottom 27% of North Carolina (577th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 3.3% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other hand, floodplain exposure registers in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled hearing disability lands in the top 4.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides in the top 4.7% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 7.1% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 8.9% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 28511, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.7%32.7–40.9
High blood pressure among adults45.4%40.9–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%8.9–12.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.7%8.8–12.9
Depression among adults24.8%21.2–28.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.6–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%37.0–46.8
Obesity among adults36.3%28.7–44.7
Stroke among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.1–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%6.7–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%79.9–85.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%79.6–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%87.9–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%60.2–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.2–65.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.0–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%12.4–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%22.1–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%26.6–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%18.7–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.6–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.5–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%12.8–17.9
Any disability among adults38.4%33.0–44.0
Hearing disability among adults11.9%10.2–13.6
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.3–12.0
Mobility disability among adults20.3%16.8–24.0
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.3–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.4–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.0–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.0–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.7–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.5–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.0–8.7
Loneliness among adults29.4%24.6–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate51.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households56.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age57.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$96,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$540,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,040$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured