Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28343

in Gibson, North CarolinaPopulation 1,574

33.17/ 100

Ranked #30,003 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranked #772 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.8%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.6%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

26.5%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

14.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

33.2%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Gibson, North Carolina (ZIP 28343) ranks in the bottom 6.5% nationally (30,003rd) and the bottom 2.7% of North Carolina (772nd).

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled self-care disability sits in the top 4.1% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 5.3% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 4.6% nationally, tooth loss lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and stroke resides in the top 4.7% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 4.4% nationally, modeled obesity registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 5.2% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 28351, just across the boundary. The area additionally shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 76.8; chronic-disease standing 6.7 (bottom 10%) — 70 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,063 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.7–35.9
High blood pressure among adults46.3%42.2–50.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.7–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Depression among adults26.5%22.7–30.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.0%15.8–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.7–43.5
Obesity among adults45.8%37.5–54.2
Stroke among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.5%22.3–31.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.9–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.1–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%76.9–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.0–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.2–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.0%47.0–55.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.5–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.8%10.4–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.1%20.2–26.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.8%29.9–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%32.6–47.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.7%27.3–34.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.8–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%16.1–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.6%19.2–24.0
Any disability among adults44.3%39.5–49.4
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Independent living disability among adults14.0%12.5–15.5
Mobility disability among adults22.8%20.3–25.5
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Vision disability among adults9.8%9.0–10.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%22.7–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.3%25.9–33.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.2%25.8–32.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.0%18.4–23.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
Loneliness among adults37.1%31.7–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6421.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)14.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)4.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)14.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle18.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate53.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households26.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+9.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age29.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$29,306$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$80,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$765$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured