ZIP code
27872
in Roxobel, North CarolinaPopulation 326
27.28/ 100
Ranked #31,207 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)
Ranked #789 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Stroke
8.7%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
10.8%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
25.5%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.2%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
31.1%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
13.7%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
57.7%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
34%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
16.1%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
37%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Roxobel, North Carolina (ZIP 27872) places in the bottom 2.7% nationally (31,207th) and the bottom 0.6% of North Carolina (789th).
The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled stroke resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 0.4% nationally, coronary heart disease settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 1.5% nationally, independent living disability rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 1.6% nationally.
Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 27869, just across the boundary. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 1.2% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 99%
14%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 53%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 1.0%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 35%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 6%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 38%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.6%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 36%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 79%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 52%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 15%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.7%
11%
Disability
in the bottom 0.2%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
27847
North Carolinashares a border
Score 27.02
Closest healthier
27869
North Carolinashares a border
Score 35.05
Similar health profile
23416
Virginia99% similar profile
Score 37.49
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 40.0% | 35.8–44.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 57.7% | 53.2–62.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.8% | 7.8–9.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.3% | 10.8–13.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 13.7% | 12.2–15.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 15.9% | 13.7–18.2 |
| Depression among adults | 22.7% | 19.0–26.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 25.5% | 22.4–28.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.8% | 38.8–48.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 47.6% | 38.6–56.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 8.7% | 7.8–9.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 34.0% | 28.9–39.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.8% | 11.7–18.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.1% | 81.4–86.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.4% | 81.3–87.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.9% | 85.9–89.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.6% | 57.6–69.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 46.0% | 41.9–50.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 69.7% | 60.6–77.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.5% | 7.6–11.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 24.3% | 20.6–28.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 41.9% | 35.9–47.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 43.2% | 35.7–50.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 37.0% | 32.4–41.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.5% | 16.1–20.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.7% | 18.1–23.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.5% | 17.8–23.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.1% | 43.6–54.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.2% | 10.8–13.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 16.1% | 14.0–18.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 31.1% | 27.2–34.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 10.8% | 9.5–12.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.2% | 11.6–14.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.2% | 24.1–32.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 34.7% | 29.6–39.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 36.3% | 31.3–41.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 22.8% | 19.4–26.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 16.8% | 14.4–19.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.0% | 28.5–39.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 18.6% | 16.1–21.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 6.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 32.6% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 24.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 35.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 24.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793 |
| Homeownership rate | 67.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 75.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799 |
| Single-parent households | 50.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790 |
| Population 65+ | 28.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799 |
| Median age | 43.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797 |
| Median household income | $39,167 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749 |
| Median home value | $99,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758 |
| Median gross rent | $1,100 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $957 ($715–$1,575) n=687 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.0 yr ± 2.43 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.43 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured