Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27568

in Pine Level, North CarolinaPopulation 1,542

51.92/ 100

Ranked #13,562 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #311 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #36 of 48 Raleigh-Cary, NC ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.84 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.1 mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 14.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

7.0%

in the top 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

59 intersections/sq mi

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

3.7%

in the bottom 32% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US32nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Pine Level, North Carolina (ZIP 27568) sits in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,562nd) and the top 39% of North Carolina (311th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: childcare resides in the top 0.6% nationally, grocery lies in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 14.0% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other hand, distance to an emergency room sits in the top 8.2% nationally, and modeled pfas registers in the top 10.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lands in the top 15.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 16% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 27527, about 6.2 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Raleigh-Cary, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.6–32.3
High blood pressure among adults36.5%32.4–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.4–9.2
Depression among adults25.5%21.8–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%32.6–41.4
Obesity among adults34.5%27.3–42.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.6–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%9.6–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.4–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.2–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%85.5–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%64.3–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%60.6–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%70.3–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.0–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.1–17.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.7%20.4–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.3%27.2–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%16.6–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.1–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.4–18.1
Any disability among adults34.2%29.7–39.3
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–10.0
Mobility disability among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.8–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%11.6–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.6–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.7–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.6%27.4–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6415.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription79.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$66,071$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$230,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$791$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured