Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Raleigh-Cary, NC metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Raleigh-Cary, NC metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202648 of 48 ZIP codes scored · 1.5M residents represented

Score snapshot

61.96Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
60.39Median scoremiddle of 48 scored ZIPs
74.64Highest score27560 · Morrisville
35.44Lowest score27555 · Micro
39.20Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#9Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
16%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.24M of 1.5M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
1.5MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
1.5MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
2ZIPs in the national top 100led by 27560 · Morrisville

The Raleigh-Cary, NC metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 48 of 48
  1. 6027560in Morrisville · 40,792 residents74.64
  2. 8227519in Cary · 69,836 residents74.11
  3. 25027608in Raleigh · 12,604 residents72.20
  4. 54527523in Apex · 20,269 residents70.25
  5. 55827613in Raleigh · 45,235 residents70.19
  6. 64327502in Apex · 48,530 residents69.69
  7. 70827513in Cary · 46,979 residents69.33
  8. 75927617in Raleigh · 20,237 residents69.03
  9. 79027518in Cary · 19,735 residents68.89
  10. 86527539in Apex · 25,878 residents68.57
  11. 1,01827540in Holly Springs · 47,771 residents67.96
  12. 1,09727615in Raleigh · 46,019 residents67.68
  13. 1,14827612in Raleigh · 41,952 residents67.46
  14. 1,15527571in Rolesville · 9,095 residents67.43
  15. 1,23427614in Raleigh · 34,226 residents67.15
  16. 1,38827562in New Hill · 5,659 residents66.65
  17. 1,80327605in Raleigh · 6,286 residents65.53
  18. 1,81927609in Raleigh · 35,573 residents65.48
  19. 1,92327587in Wake Forest · 82,886 residents65.19
  20. 2,56827511in Cary · 33,221 residents63.81
  21. 3,39227607in Raleigh · 28,438 residents62.21
  22. 3,62527526in Fuquay Varina · 61,588 residents61.81
  23. 3,97727527in Archer Lodge · 39,256 residents61.24
  24. 4,38627606in Raleigh · 45,444 residents60.63
  25. 4,74927616in Raleigh · 63,520 residents60.15
  26. 4,83627603in Raleigh · 53,972 residents60.04
  27. 4,92927529in Garner · 55,242 residents59.90
  28. 5,99527592in Willow Spring · 21,114 residents58.49
  29. 6,49127596in Youngsville · 22,232 residents57.89
  30. 6,98427520in Clayton · 48,014 residents57.30
  31. 7,18627591in Wendell · 29,838 residents57.10
  32. 8,27627601in Raleigh · 9,905 residents56.00
  33. 8,93827545in Knightdale · 34,163 residents55.44
  34. 8,95527604in Raleigh · 44,514 residents55.43
  35. 10,61927525in Franklinton · 17,110 residents54.06
  36. 13,56227568in Pine Level · 1,542 residents51.92
  37. 14,25327610in Raleigh · 81,419 residents51.42
  38. 14,28727504in Benson · 17,079 residents51.40
  39. 14,46727597in Zebulon · 30,184 residents51.26
  40. 16,63527524in Four Oaks · 13,999 residents49.72
  41. 18,00427569in Princeton · 8,833 residents48.75
  42. 18,55627542in Kenly · 9,850 residents48.30
  43. 18,99927576in Selma · 21,624 residents47.94
  44. 20,57227549in Louisburg · 25,543 residents46.65
  45. 21,41727577in Smithfield · 28,354 residents45.94
  46. 23,27827816in Castalia · 3,019 residents44.15
  47. 23,87227508in Bunn · 2,362 residents43.53
  48. 29,21627555in Micro · 573 residents35.44
Open the full Raleigh-Cary, NC metro ranking →One page, all 48 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Raleigh-Cary, NC metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

10 of 48 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Healthcare Access27%414,808 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 27511 Cary27607 Raleigh27610 Raleigh

Social Need / SDOH26%391,958 people

Standing highest: 27518 Cary27608 Raleigh27615 Raleigh

Disability25%378,131 people

Standing highest: 27519 Cary27560 Morrisville27608 Raleigh

Risk Behavior25%377,647 people

Standing highest: 27518 Cary27519 Cary27608 Raleigh

Chronic Disease Burden25%374,582 people

Standing highest: 27519 Cary27560 Morrisville27607 Raleigh

Mental Health24%368,916 people

Standing highest: 27519 Cary27523 Apex27560 Morrisville

Preventive Care24%368,516 people

Standing highest: 27518 Cary27608 Raleigh27615 Raleigh

Environmental Hazard20%296,696 people

Standing highest: 27502 Apex27542 Kenly27816 Castalia

Climate / Disaster Risk14%205,130 people

Standing highest: 27555 Micro27571 Rolesville27605 Raleigh

Each fifth is about 10 of this metro’s 48 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 1,511,514 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Raleigh-Cary, NC figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.