Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27105

in Winston-Salem, North CarolinaPopulation 40,678

36.97/ 100

Ranked #28,539 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.0%)

Ranked #744 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 6.2%)

Ranked #38 of 39 Winston-Salem, NC ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

50.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,144 units

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

33.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 27105, one of several in Winston-Salem, North Carolina lands in the bottom 11.0% nationally (28,539th) and the bottom 6.2% of North Carolina (744th).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled obesity lands in the top 0.5% nationally, self-care disability lies in the top 3.0% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss rests in the top 3.6% nationally, utility shutoff registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and transportation resides in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the top 4.1% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity sits in the top 4.3% nationally. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 1.1% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. On the overall standing, ZIP 27019, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Winston-Salem, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.3 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $44,080 predicts 76.8 years — 3.6 years below.

    Ranked #4,742 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.3 ± 0.8 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.9 years — 4.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,269 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.9–32.2
High blood pressure among adults45.3%41.2–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.3–14.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Depression among adults22.6%19.3–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%16.7–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.4%30.4–38.3
Obesity among adults50.8%43.7–57.5
Stroke among adults5.8%5.4–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.2%24.7–33.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.3%15.2–19.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.1–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.9–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.5%56.3–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.1%44.2–51.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%71.2–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%9.6–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%17.2–22.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.5%31.9–41.1
Short sleep duration among adults41.6%35.7–47.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.0%27.8–34.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.1–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%18.1–22.3
Any disability among adults42.2%37.8–46.4
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Independent living disability among adults13.4%12.2–14.8
Mobility disability among adults22.4%20.1–24.8
Self-care disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.5
Vision disability among adults10.6%9.8–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.8%25.0–32.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults33.3%29.9–36.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults32.5%29.4–35.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.3–28.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.0%15.3–18.8
Loneliness among adults36.5%31.7–41.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.7–20.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6422.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)17.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)10.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle15.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate53.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population10.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households31.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age34.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$44,080$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$168,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$926$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.3 yr ± 0.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.43 years of 73.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured