ZIP code
26717
in Elk Garden, West VirginiaPopulation 1,593
34.22/ 100
Ranked #29,654 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.6%)
Ranked #364 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Crowded housing
15.9%
in the top 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
59%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST9thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.1%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST75thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
19.2%
in the top 5.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
49.1%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST71stUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
3.6%
in the bottom 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
23.1%
in the top 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST68thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
96.8%
in the top 6.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST79thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
30%
in the top 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST62ndUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
44.8%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST47thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Elk Garden, West Virginia (ZIP 26717) comes out in the bottom 7.6% nationally (29,654th) and the bottom 48% of West Virginia (364th).
The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: crowded housing settles in the top 2.0% nationally, home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 5.2% nationally, high blood pressure is in the top 4.4% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 8.4% nationally, and high cholesterol lies in the top 4.8% nationally. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and homeownership settles in the top 6.6% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 21538, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 88%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 56%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 46%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 8%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 4%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 81%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 68%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 57%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 58%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 31%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 31%
16%
Disability
healthier than 37%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 38%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 87.8; chronic-disease standing 2.4 (bottom 10%) — 85 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #264 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
21538
Marylandshares a border
Score 44.09
Closest healthier
21550
Marylandshares a border
Score 53.04
Similar health profile
26802
West Virginia100% similar profile
Score 34.33
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 43.6% | 40.5–46.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 49.1% | 45.6–52.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.0% | 10.1–11.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.2% | 11.0–13.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.1% | 10.1–12.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.8% | 12.2–15.6 |
| Depression among adults | 30.7% | 27.4–34.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.2% | 17.2–21.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.8% | 41.3–48.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.3% | 37.4–49.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.3% | 4.8–5.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.3% | 20.8–28.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.3% | 7.6–11.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.4% | 80.3–84.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.7% | 79.0–84.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.5% | 85.9–89.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.9% | 60.6–69.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 54.2% | 50.6–57.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.3% | 67.4–80.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.2% | 11.3–15.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 23.2% | 20.2–26.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.5% | 32.9–42.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.3% | 34.0–45.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.0% | 26.7–33.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.7% | 18.7–22.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 20.1% | 18.1–22.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.3% | 17.2–21.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.2% | 39.1–47.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.2% | 10.1–12.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.3% | 10.9–13.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 23.1% | 20.5–25.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 5.0–6.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.2–7.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.1% | 20.0–26.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.5% | 14.7–20.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 21.0% | 17.7–24.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.7% | 10.9–14.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 8.1–10.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.8% | 27.5–36.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.7% | 10.2–13.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 13.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 5.4% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 7.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 8.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 59.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 3.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 15.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 28.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 14.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 29.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | $74,712 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | $101,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 75.1 yr ± 1.63 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 75.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured