ZIP code
26582
in Mannington, West VirginiaPopulation 3,743
33.58/ 100
Ranked #29,875 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.9%)
Ranked #388 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 44%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Tree cover
87.1%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST65thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
45.3%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST57thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
18.5%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST63rdUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Obesity
45.2%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST80thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Grocery access
0.22 per 1,000 residents
in the top 6.3% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS94thDefinition & source ›
The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
20.6%
in the top 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST62ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Pharmacy access
0.44 per 1,000 residents
in the top 6.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST87thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
24.3%
in the top 8.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST54thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
47.4%
in the top 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST53rdUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
12.6%
in the top 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST60thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
Mannington, West Virginia (ZIP 26582), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally (29,875th) and the bottom 44% of West Virginia (388th).
The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled tree cover rests in the top 2.3% nationally, grocery sits in the top 6.3% nationally, and pharmacy registers in the top 6.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 3.8% nationally, diabetes resides in the top 6.8% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 7.2% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the top 7.0% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 8.4% nationally.
A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 26386, just across the boundary. Modeled obesity rests in the top 4.1% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 74%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 49%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 48%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 39%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 4%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 78%
16%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 64%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 45%
13%
Disability
healthier than 40%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 39%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 39%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 37%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
26386
West Virginiashares a border
Score 40.82
Closest healthier
26431
West Virginiashares a border
Score 40.02
Similar health profile
26456
West Virginia100% similar profile
Score 37.24
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 41.5% | 37.9–45.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.4% | 43.2–51.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.0% | 9.0–11.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.8% | 11.3–14.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.2% | 9.2–11.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.2% | 11.6–14.8 |
| Depression among adults | 31.1% | 27.0–35.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.5% | 16.3–20.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.3% | 41.0–49.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 45.2% | 38.6–51.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.9% | 4.5–5.4 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 24.3% | 20.6–28.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 9.6% | 7.9–11.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.9% | 78.2–83.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.3% | 77.9–84.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.2% | 84.3–88.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.3% | 60.4–69.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 51.5% | 47.7–55.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.0% | 67.6–81.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.3% | 11.7–17.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 23.3% | 20.3–26.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.3% | 31.6–41.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 41.8% | 36.2–47.8 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.5% | 26.1–33.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.6% | 20.2–25.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.4% | 17.3–21.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.6% | 18.3–23.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.2% | 38.7–47.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.1% | 9.0–11.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.6% | 11.1–14.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.1% | 19.6–24.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.6% | 5.0–6.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.2–7.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.7% | 19.5–26.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.3% | 16.4–22.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.2% | 19.0–25.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.9% | 11.9–15.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.1% | 8.8–11.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.3% | 29.8–39.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 10.7–13.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 14.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 15.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 12.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 4.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 76.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 18.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 83.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 54.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 24.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 50.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | $52,083 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | $100,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | $765 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured