Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24719

in Covel, West VirginiaPopulation 123

33.59/ 100

Ranked #29,873 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.9%)

Ranked #387 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

19.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

86%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST60th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.3%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

14.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Covel, West Virginia (ZIP 24719) sits in the bottom 6.9% nationally (29,873rd) and the bottom 44% of West Virginia (387th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: crowded housing stands in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled high blood pressure is in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally, unemployment registers in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the top 5.3% nationally. More positively, modeled transportation noise resides at the national minimum, and homeownership lies at the national maximum. Modeled tree cover settles in the top 2.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 24726, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.0%37.8–46.3
High blood pressure among adults50.1%45.5–54.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.5%10.5–14.7
Depression among adults30.4%26.2–34.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.4%15.9–21.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.3%41.7–51.0
Obesity among adults45.3%37.3–53.7
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.1%20.8–29.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%6.2–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.0–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.1–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%85.6–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.3%49.7–60.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.3%47.3–55.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.1–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.0–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.6%19.2–28.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.6%30.7–42.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.6%36.9–50.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%24.8–33.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.5–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.4%16.7–22.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%16.5–22.2
Any disability among adults43.0%37.4–48.8
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.5
Independent living disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.4
Mobility disability among adults21.3%18.2–24.9
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.5–6.4
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.1–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.4%13.6–21.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.0%15.7–24.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.4–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–11.1
Loneliness among adults33.8%28.3–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.1–14.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)14.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)19.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households0.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+8.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured