Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25054

in Dawes, West VirginiaPopulation 238

31.79/ 100

Ranked #30,367 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranked #459 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #56 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

69.4%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

28.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

32.4%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

9.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite measure, Dawes, West Virginia (ZIP 25054) sits in the bottom 5.3% nationally (30,367th) and the bottom 34% of West Virginia (459th).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.8% nationally, households without a vehicle registers in the top 2.6% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 4.1% nationally. Better still, modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Housing-cost burden is at the national minimum, and poverty rests at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription sits at the national maximum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 25061, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults43.1%39.6–46.4
High blood pressure among adults48.6%44.8–52.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%9.8–12.3
Current asthma among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.1%10.8–15.6
Depression among adults33.8%29.9–37.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.5%15.0–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.3%42.4–49.9
Obesity among adults41.6%36.5–46.6
Stroke among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.5%17.3–24.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%6.2–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%80.0–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.2–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%85.6–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%68.4–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.3%53.9–60.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%66.9–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.1–14.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%17.5–26.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.1%32.1–43.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%35.4–43.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%23.5–33.0
Frequent mental distress among adults23.2%20.2–26.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.4%16.6–22.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.0%17.6–24.6
Any disability among adults45.0%39.4–50.3
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.2–11.0
Independent living disability among adults13.3%11.0–15.7
Mobility disability among adults23.3%19.6–26.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.5–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.4–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.2%15.8–25.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.0%16.8–27.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.3–17.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.5
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.9–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.1–14.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6419.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle28.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate32.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households32.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age32.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$95,952$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured