Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25039

in Cedar Grove, West VirginiaPopulation 629

33.21/ 100

Ranked #29,989 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranked #401 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #46 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

95.1%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

6.0%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.5%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.8%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

17.8%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Cedar Grove, West Virginia (ZIP 25039), overall, ranks in the bottom 6.5% nationally (29,989th) and the bottom 42% of West Virginia (401st).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 0.9% nationally, cognitive disability stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 3.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the top 5.4% nationally, modeled independent living disability resides in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the top 6.5% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the better side, modeled tree cover lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and lead in tap water lies at the national minimum.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 25015, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.4%35.2–41.6
High blood pressure among adults46.6%42.8–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%10.3–13.6
Depression among adults31.9%28.2–35.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.2–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%40.3–47.7
Obesity among adults40.7%35.6–45.8
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.2%18.9–25.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%7.7–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.3–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.1–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.8–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%64.0–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.8%52.6–59.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%67.8–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.5%20.4–27.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.5%32.0–41.1
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%36.3–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.6%24.2–31.5
Frequent mental distress among adults23.4%20.9–25.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.5–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.5%19.0–24.3
Any disability among adults44.0%39.7–48.4
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.0–14.3
Mobility disability among adults21.0%18.4–23.9
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%23.6–30.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.4–23.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%16.6–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.2–16.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.2–11.0
Loneliness among adults36.5%32.6–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.5–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)15.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)3.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)8.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle17.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate83.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households37.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+30.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age60.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$45,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$87,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$583$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 2.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.74 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured