Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24931

in Crawley, West VirginiaPopulation 1,173

40.76/ 100

Ranked #26,220 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #143 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

24.2 mi

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.2%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.66 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

70.2%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST25th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.1%

in the top 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$43,333

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST24th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US78th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Crawley, West Virginia (ZIP 24931), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,220th) and the top 21% of West Virginia (143rd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 3.2% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and civic registers in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 7.3% nationally, and high cholesterol settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Unemployment is in the top 11.2% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 10.5% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 24901, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 87.9; chronic-disease standing 6.7 (bottom 10%) — 81 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #439 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.6%38.6–46.6
High blood pressure among adults47.2%42.6–51.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.6–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.2–13.7
Depression among adults28.7%24.8–32.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.0%14.6–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.5%40.1–49.0
Obesity among adults39.8%32.6–47.1
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.5–21.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.1–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.5–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.4–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.3–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.9%64.1–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.4%51.7–59.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.1–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.5–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%16.8–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.6%28.4–39.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%31.3–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.4%22.1–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.6–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.1–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.2%15.0–19.7
Any disability among adults37.8%33.0–42.8
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.2
Mobility disability among adults20.1%17.2–23.2
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.6–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.8–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.3–19.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.9–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.1
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.8–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)9.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription82.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate73.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$43,333$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$114,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$924$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.3978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.39 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured