Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24609

in Cedar Bluff, VirginiaPopulation 6,923

44.01/ 100

Ranked #23,408 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #685 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

48.9%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Cedar Bluff, Virginia (ZIP 24609) stands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,408th) and the bottom 22% of Virginia (685th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: mental-health providers registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 7.1% nationally. Outpatient is in the top 9.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 12.4% nationally, modeled tree cover is in the top 12.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Transit lies in the top 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas is in the top 14.2% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the top 11.6% nationally.

For clarity, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 24266, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $53,958 predicts 77.6 years — 5.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,627 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.8 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.7 years — 3.4 years below them.

    Ranked #2,660 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.2%32.3–38.3
High blood pressure among adults42.0%38.6–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.4–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Depression among adults27.2%24.0–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%39.2–46.5
Obesity among adults39.5%33.6–45.9
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%12.1–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.1–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%77.1–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.7–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%62.6–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.6–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.6–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.7–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%16.0–20.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%26.2–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%33.3–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%21.7–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.9–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%15.9–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.9–19.5
Any disability among adults39.7%36.0–43.5
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.6–21.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%18.0–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.2–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Loneliness among adults34.7%30.4–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)12.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households65.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+24.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$53,958$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$157,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$857$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured