Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24354

in Marion, VirginiaPopulation 13,001

43.74/ 100

Ranked #23,667 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #697 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Park land

25.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13.7 mi

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

68.3%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$44,502

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Marion, Virginia (ZIP 24354) ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,667th) and the bottom 20% of Virginia (697th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: mental-health providers sits in the top 3.9% nationally, and fiber broadband is in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Park land resides in the top 5.5% nationally, physicians registers in the top 9.2% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover lies in the top 10.0% nationally, and elder services lands in the top 11.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 8.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 24319, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.2 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $44,502 predicts 76.9 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,692 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.1–37.3
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.5–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Depression among adults26.4%22.7–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.5–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.9–46.0
Obesity among adults38.3%30.4–46.7
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%15.9–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.4–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.2–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%75.9–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.8–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.8–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%55.2–62.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%63.6–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.2–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%16.0–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%25.9–35.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%30.7–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.0–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.0–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.7–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.1–20.2
Any disability among adults38.3%33.7–43.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.5
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.5–22.2
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.5–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.0–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.9–18.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.0–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.8–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.3–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription80.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate65.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households54.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+23.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age47.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$44,502$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$158,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$712$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured