Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23236

in Richmond, VirginiaPopulation 27,903

60.64/ 100

Ranked #4,364 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #137 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #18 of 93 Richmond, VA ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.69 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.7%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.1 per million

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 23236, one of several in Richmond, Virginia lands in the top 13.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,364th) and the top 16% of Virginia (137th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: lead in tap water sits at the national minimum, mental-health providers lands in the top 5.0% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 5.1% nationally. Civic stands in the top 7.8% nationally, home broadband subscription rests in the top 8.2% nationally, and recreation registers in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled mammography resides in the top 7.1% nationally, and colon screening settles in the top 7.0% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 2.4% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 8.7% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. On the overall standing, ZIP 23112, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Richmond, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.3–31.8
High blood pressure among adults37.5%34.2–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Depression among adults21.0%18.3–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%37.4–44.7
Obesity among adults35.0%30.1–40.1
Stroke among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.6–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.5–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.2–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.2–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.6%88.2–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.7–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.6%68.9–74.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%75.8–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.2–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%18.6–24.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%29.3–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%14.1–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%11.0–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Any disability among adults27.7%24.5–31.1
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.2–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Loneliness among adults31.7%27.5–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population8.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households54.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$110,499$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$346,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,811$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured