Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22311

in Alexandria, VirginiaPopulation 19,337

57.88/ 100

Ranked #6,507 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #194 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #218 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

18.5%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

17.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.3%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 22311, one of several in Alexandria, Virginia ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,507th) and the top 22% of Virginia (194th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: walkability lies in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Physicians lands in the top 6.3% nationally, and transit registers in the top 6.8% nationally. Against that, homeownership sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 4.6% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the top 4.9% nationally, PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 5.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 22206, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.4%18.2–22.7
High blood pressure among adults30.4%27.2–33.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.4%4.9–5.8
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Depression among adults21.0%18.2–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%30.2–37.2
Obesity among adults33.8%28.1–39.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.5–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.0–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.5%67.6–73.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.4–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.8–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%60.4–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.0%60.9–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%73.2–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.7–28.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%33.1–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.5%17.1–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.9–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
Any disability among adults29.7%26.3–33.3
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.4–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.8–20.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.4–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.4–17.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Loneliness among adults36.7%32.2–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6424.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle17.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate18.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population41.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households38.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+11.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$87,626$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$760,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,963$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured