Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22206

in Arlington, VirginiaPopulation 20,703

71.33/ 100

Ranked #373 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.2%)

Ranked #22 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranked #44 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

2.8%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

23.2%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

6.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$140,877

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

0.89%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

6.7%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

10.7%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 22206, one of several in Arlington, Virginia places in the top 1.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (373rd) and the top 2.6% of Virginia (22nd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and high blood pressure resides in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 1.6% nationally, transit lands in the top 3.0% nationally, and household income stands in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 0.7% nationally, diabetes settles in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the bottom 1.5% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 22203, about 1.2 miles away. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.3; chronic-disease standing 98.2 (top 10%) — 70 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,374 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.3%15.1–19.5
High blood pressure among adults23.2%20.3–26.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Depression among adults22.9%19.8–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.1%27.6–34.6
Obesity among adults26.3%21.4–31.3
Stroke among adults1.6%1.5–1.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.5%3.6–5.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.3–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.1%63.6–70.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.0–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.4–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%65.8–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.3%72.7–77.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%74.1–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.1–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.0%5.9–8.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.8%11.4–16.3
Short sleep duration among adults28.2%23.9–32.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.7%9.2–12.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Any disability among adults19.3%16.6–22.2
Hearing disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Independent living disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Mobility disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Self-care disability among adults1.8%1.6–1.9
Vision disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.3%15.5–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–9.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.5–6.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.8–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.9–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate45.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population16.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+9.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age35.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$140,877$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$586,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,381$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured