Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22191

in Woodbridge, VirginiaPopulation 73,623

57.77/ 100

Ranked #6,590 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #196 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #219 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,708 units

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

94.1%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

94.1%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

14.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.0%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 22191, one of several in Woodbridge, Virginia lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,590th) and the top 22% of Virginia (196th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and lead in tap water resides at the national minimum. Modeled hearing disability registers in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and park land lies in the top 9.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 6.5% nationally, PFOA in drinking water sits in the top 6.9% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water is in the top 7.1% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 10.7% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 22025, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.4%17.4–22.1
High blood pressure among adults31.7%28.7–35.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Depression among adults20.1%17.5–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%10.1–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%30.6–37.8
Obesity among adults36.7%31.9–42.9
Stroke among adults2.6%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.9–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.5%12.0–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.2%69.4–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.1–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%57.3–65.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.8%60.7–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%70.8–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.6–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.8–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%22.5–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%36.5–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.9–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.8–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.3–16.8
Any disability among adults29.6%26.5–33.8
Hearing disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%21.4–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.3–20.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.2–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%14.1–18.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Loneliness among adults36.1%31.8–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6419.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription96.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate57.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population33.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households42.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age34.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$109,316$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$454,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,125$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured