Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10038

in New York, New YorkPopulation 22,235

62.79/ 100

Ranked #3,082 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #406 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #522 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

15.7%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

570 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.07% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

82.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

23.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

21.8%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

0.84%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

10 ppb

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US97th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

31.6%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 10038, one of several in New York, New York ranks in the top 9.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,082nd) and the top 23% of New York (406th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled obesity registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and walkability rests in the top 0.07% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and energy burden lies in the bottom 0.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Set against that, households without a vehicle sits in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled binge drinking is in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled loneliness settles in the top 1.9% nationally. Lead in tap water resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and homeownership registers in the bottom 3.5% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 10004, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.4%14.2–16.8
High blood pressure among adults21.8%20.3–23.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.4–5.2
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.1%3.7–4.7
Depression among adults19.2%17.4–21.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.2%7.5–9.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.3%30.4–34.7
Obesity among adults15.7%13.8–17.9
Stroke among adults2.4%2.2–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.4–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%69.2–73.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%74.8–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.0%57.5–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%63.6–68.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%71.8–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.2%21.2–25.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%7.2–9.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%18.8–23.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%31.2–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%13.8–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.2–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.5%10.2–13.1
Any disability among adults22.8%20.8–25.3
Hearing disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Mobility disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.9%25.8–32.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.2–18.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.1–14.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Loneliness among adults42.0%38.4–45.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)15.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle82.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate31.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population25.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households50.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age33.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$105,419$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$921,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,189$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured