Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21663

in St. Michaels, MarylandPopulation 3,764

60.19/ 100

Ranked #4,716 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #189 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

78%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.3%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.1%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

St. Michaels, Maryland (ZIP 21663) ranks in the top 14.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,716th) and the top 41% of Maryland (189th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled colon screening rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and transportation lands in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and short sleep rests in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally, housing insecurity settles in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the bottom 9.7% nationally. By contrast, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 3.0% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 8.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure rests in the top 10.0% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 21612, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.1; chronic-disease standing 23.6 — 60 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,776 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.7–40.3
High blood pressure among adults44.4%40.8–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.7%13.4–16.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%6.8–10.1
Depression among adults20.1%17.4–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.8–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.8%42.1–49.5
Obesity among adults28.8%24.3–33.8
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.1–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.8–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.5%82.1–86.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.2%82.7–87.3
Cholesterol screening among adults93.6%92.6–94.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years78.0%74.3–81.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.0%70.0–75.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.8–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.5–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.8%7.7–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.7%18.8–26.9
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%25.3–33.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%14.5–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%10.7–13.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.6–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.7–11.9
Any disability among adults30.0%25.9–34.1
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.9
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.7–8.1
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.1–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.3%15.5–21.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%6.9–10.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.6–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.7
Loneliness among adults29.2%25.1–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription90.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate78.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households64.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+33.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age56.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$89,775$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$650,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,067$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.95 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured