Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21244

in Windsor Mill, MarylandPopulation 38,208

56.45/ 100

Ranked #7,815 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #262 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #113 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

3.8%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.7%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.2%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

49%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

13.4%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Windsor Mill, Maryland (ZIP 21244) lands in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,815th) and the bottom 43% of Maryland (262nd).

continue reading

A handful of measures stand out most sharply across the profile here: modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and binge drinking is in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the top 3.1% nationally, and elder services resides in the top 9.5% nationally. Transit registers in the top 9.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled short sleep rests in the top 5.3% nationally, loneliness stands in the top 6.8% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the top 7.4% nationally. Homeownership lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 10.1% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 21042, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $85,114 predicts 79.4 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,409 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%23.0–26.6
High blood pressure among adults39.2%36.9–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Current asthma among adults12.2%11.1–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Depression among adults18.4%16.6–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.5–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%32.0–36.5
Obesity among adults39.4%36.0–43.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.6–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%8.0–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%74.5–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%79.4–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.7–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%65.2–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%54.7–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%78.5–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%26.6–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.6%40.3–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%18.7–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.8–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.6
Any disability among adults26.5%24.2–29.0
Hearing disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.3%12.0–14.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.7%28.6–34.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.5%20.9–26.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.3%16.9–21.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.8–23.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Loneliness among adults38.7%35.2–42.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.8–15.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate49.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population15.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households40.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+11.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$85,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$282,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,622$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured