Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20877

in Gaithersburg, MarylandPopulation 38,546

58.59/ 100

Ranked #5,910 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #227 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #208 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

908 units

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.6%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.9%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

17.9%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

43.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

43.7%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 20877, one of several in Gaithersburg, Maryland comes out in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,910th) and the top 50% of Maryland (227th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 1.7% nationally, dental providers lands in the top 3.6% nationally, and mental-health providers is in the top 3.8% nationally. Lead in tap water resides at the national minimum. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 4.9% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water lies at the national maximum. Crowded housing sits in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled uninsured settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Homeownership registers in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 6.4% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 20850, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.0%18.4–21.6
High blood pressure among adults32.6%30.3–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Depression among adults17.7%15.8–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%11.1–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%37.1–42.0
Obesity among adults29.9%26.5–33.2
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.9–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.9%15.8–20.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%70.5–75.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.2%71.6–76.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.5–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%59.1–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.9%55.4–60.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%71.8–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%11.4–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%24.0–29.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%34.1–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%20.3–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.1–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.7–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.9–15.7
Any disability among adults28.5%26.1–31.0
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.4%11.2–13.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%24.0–29.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.9%20.4–25.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.4–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.5–20.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Loneliness among adults36.6%33.5–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–6429.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)25.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle14.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate43.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population48.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households37.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$92,800$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$474,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,887$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured