Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20855

in Derwood, MarylandPopulation 17,279

69.51/ 100

Ranked #680 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #34 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 7.5%)

Ranked #71 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$149,110

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.4%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.8%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Park land

18.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.1%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Derwood, Maryland (ZIP 20855) comes out in the top 2.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (680th) and the top 7.5% of Maryland (34th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: household income rests in the top 4.0% nationally, modeled obesity lies in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and lead in tap water sits at the national minimum. Mental-health providers settles in the top 5.3% nationally, fiber broadband registers in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and park land is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Set against that, PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 20832, just across the boundary. This ZIP further sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.1%19.3–22.8
High blood pressure among adults31.3%29.1–33.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults17.6%15.8–19.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%39.3–44.3
Obesity among adults24.4%21.6–27.3
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.5–7.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%6.4–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.1–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%74.5–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.8–91.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%67.3–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.1%67.9–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%76.0–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.9–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.3%6.4–8.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%16.3–20.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%29.8–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%13.1–16.0
Frequent mental distress among adults12.1%10.9–13.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Any disability among adults21.4%19.5–23.5
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.8
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Mobility disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%19.5–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Loneliness among adults32.3%29.4–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription97.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population31.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households52.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$149,110$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$640,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$2,413$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured