ZIP code
20373
in Naval Anacost Annex, District of ColumbiaPopulation 383
67.16/ 100
Ranked #1,231 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.9%)
Ranked #14 of 28 District of Columbia ZIPs (top 50%)
Ranked #100 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
37.6%
in the top 0.01% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
15.7%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
9.3%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
US99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Obesity
14.7%
in the bottom 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.2%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
0.80%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.50%
in the bottom 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
1.8%
in the bottom 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
US99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›The read
Naval Anacost Annex, District of Columbia (ZIP 20373), overall, ranks in the top 3.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,231st) and the top 50% of the District of Columbia (14th).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 0.7% nationally, high blood pressure stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 0.04% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally, coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and stroke settles in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 0.04% nationally. Set against that, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 0.01% nationally, and crowded housing lands at the national maximum. Housing-cost burden lies at the national maximum.
Measured against the nearby ZIPs, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 20003, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.06%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 94%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 71%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.08%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 71%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 31%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 26%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 96%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 93%
11%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 22%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 19%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 37%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.4%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Disability
in the top 0.7%
7%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 14%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 29%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
20003
District of Columbiashares a border
Score 67.33
Closest healthier
20319
District of Columbiaabout 0.1 mi away
Score 67.89
Similar health profile
75206
Texas98% similar profile
Score 65.89
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 3.5% | 2.8–4.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 9.3% | 7.5–11.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.2% | 1.1–1.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.1% | 7.0–9.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 0.8% | 0.6–0.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 1.1% | 0.8–1.4 |
| Depression among adults | 21.5% | 17.5–26.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.2% | 1.0–1.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 15.7% | 13.1–18.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 14.7% | 10.8–19.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.5% | 0.4–0.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.4% | 6.6–10.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.4% | 3.9–7.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 25.0% | 22.0–28.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 63.8% | 58.0–69.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 78.0% | 72.7–82.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 67.6% | 62.9–72.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 73.8% | 69.6–77.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.6% | 70.7–83.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 37.6% | 33.2–42.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 4.4% | 2.8–6.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 7.2% | 5.0–10.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 28.6% | 23.6–33.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 6.6% | 5.0–8.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.5% | 12.4–19.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 4.9% | 3.9–6.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.9% | 9.8–16.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 16.3% | 12.2–21.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.5–2.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.3–5.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.4–2.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 0.8% | 0.6–1.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.1% | 1.6–2.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 23.2% | 18.9–28.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.1% | 5.6–11.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.1–6.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.2% | 5.3–9.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.0% | 5.2–9.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 43.3% | 37.9–48.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 3.9% | 2.9–5.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | DC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | DC distribution suppressed (n=26 < 30). |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | DC distribution suppressed (n=27 < 30). |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | DC distribution suppressed (n=29 < 30). |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 34.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | DC distribution suppressed (n=29 < 30). |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | DC distribution suppressed (n=29 < 30). |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | DC distribution suppressed (n=25 < 30). |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | DC distribution suppressed (n=25 < 30). |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 100.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | DC distribution suppressed (n=25 < 30). |
| Homeownership rate | 0.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | DC distribution suppressed (n=25 < 30). |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 100.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | DC distribution suppressed (n=25 < 30). |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | DC distribution suppressed (n=29 < 30). |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | DC distribution suppressed (n=23 < 30). |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | DC distribution suppressed (n=29 < 30). |
| Median age | 20.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | DC distribution suppressed (n=28 < 30). |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | DC distribution suppressed (n=22 < 30). |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | DC distribution suppressed (n=22 < 30). |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | DC distribution suppressed (n=22 < 30). |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | DC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 70.0 yr ± 1.75 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.1 yr (74.0–84.9) n=39 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.75 years of 70.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured