Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57006

in Brookings, South DakotaPopulation 24,192

56.83/ 100

Ranked #7,431 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #77 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.5%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

88.8 mi

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST43rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.6%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

26%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8.1 ppb

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

7.5%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Brookings, South Dakota (ZIP 57006) sits in the top 23% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,431st) and the top 21% of South Dakota (77th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 2.3% nationally, distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 1.4% nationally, radon sits in the top 4.2% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 4.4% nationally. Lead in tap water stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 5.0% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 57002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.7 ± 1.1 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 82.2 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,739 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 16.3; chronic-disease standing 91.3 (top 10%) — 75 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,836 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.1%17.3–21.1
High blood pressure among adults26.0%23.5–28.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.8
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Depression among adults24.0%21.1–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.5%25.8–31.2
Obesity among adults37.0%32.7–41.5
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%9.1–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.5–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.5%69.0–73.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%70.8–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults79.9%77.5–82.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%64.9–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.5%66.6–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%74.3–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.4%18.6–24.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.3%16.6–22.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%26.8–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.7–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.6–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.4%9.3–11.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.9–16.6
Any disability among adults26.5%23.6–29.8
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Mobility disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate51.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population7.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households54.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age28.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$66,337$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$273,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$887$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured