Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20155

in Gainesville, VirginiaPopulation 37,486

66.58/ 100

Ranked #1,409 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.4%)

Ranked #66 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 7.6%)

Ranked #109 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$164,279

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.7%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

276 units

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.7%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.2%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.8%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Gainesville, Virginia (ZIP 20155) places in the top 4.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,409th) and the top 7.6% of Virginia (66th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income lies in the top 2.6% nationally, and dental providers rests in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and poverty is in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 8.9% nationally, modeled transportation stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and modeled independent living disability registers in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 5.3% nationally, modeled fair or poor health sits in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and grocery lies in the top 10.3% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 20137, just across the boundary. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.8%21.4–26.9
High blood pressure among adults33.0%29.9–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Depression among adults20.0%17.5–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%35.2–42.8
Obesity among adults30.3%26.0–36.1
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%5.0–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.8–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.9–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.3–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.8–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%63.1–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.4%70.7–76.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.3–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.4–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%8.2–11.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.7%17.0–23.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%30.9–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.5%11.9–15.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%12.1–15.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.7%9.5–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.3
Any disability among adults25.8%22.8–29.6
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.6
Independent living disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.5
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.9–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–5.9
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.3–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate85.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population20.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households48.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age40.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$164,279$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$659,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,642$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured