Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19730

in Odessa, DelawarePopulation 425

64.19/ 100

Ranked #2,349 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.4%)

Ranked #8 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranked #83 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

3.3%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.9%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.0%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Odessa, Delaware (ZIP 19730) lands in the top 7.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,349th) and the top 12.5% of Delaware (8th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Poverty lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Set against that, PFOA in drinking water is at the national maximum, modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 2.0% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. This ZIP stands out as the strongest overall among its immediate neighbors.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.5–29.3
High blood pressure among adults32.1%28.7–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.0–6.5
Depression among adults21.6%18.5–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.1–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.8–43.4
Obesity among adults29.2%23.8–34.8
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years3.3%2.6–4.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%4.9–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.0–78.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.5–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.3–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.7%68.9–76.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.1%70.0–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.9–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.4–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.7%6.7–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.8%15.2–22.7
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%26.3–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.7%10.5–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.0–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.3%8.6–12.1
Any disability among adults24.0%20.4–28.0
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.6–6.5
Mobility disability among adults10.4%8.5–12.6
Self-care disability among adults2.3%1.9–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.5–3.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.7–9.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.3%3.9–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.0–5.6
Loneliness among adults28.7%25.2–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–6418.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate80.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households49.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+25.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$112,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$322,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 2.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured