Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14777

in Rushford, New YorkPopulation 454

49.81/ 100

Ranked #16,515 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #1,454 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

19.6 mi

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.3%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.7%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.4%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

42.2%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.4 pCi/L

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.6%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Rushford, New York (ZIP 14777) lands in the bottom 48% nationally (16,515th) and the bottom 16% of New York (1,454th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, distance to an emergency room is in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 15% nationally.

Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. On the overall standing, ZIP 14060, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.8–38.3
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.8–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.7%9.3–12.3
Depression among adults20.3%17.2–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.3–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.7%39.2–48.4
Obesity among adults36.7%29.4–44.8
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.3–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.3–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.5–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.5–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.2–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%64.4–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.6%56.9–64.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%69.2–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%12.9–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.0–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.2–33.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%29.9–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%18.9–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.2–16.1
Any disability among adults32.8%28.7–37.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.8%15.5–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.3–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.1–18.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.9–17.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.4–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.6–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)21.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate89.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$57,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$93,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured