Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14737

in Franklinville, New YorkPopulation 4,376

49.38/ 100

Ranked #17,117 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #1,480 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 14.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

13.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

69%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

25%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

14.6 days/year

in the bottom 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.3 pCi/L

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US76th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Franklinville, New York (ZIP 14737) places in the bottom 47% nationally (17,117th) and the bottom 14.5% of New York (1,480th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 9.7% nationally, and humid heat settles in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Civic sits in the top 13.0% nationally, recreation lies in the top 16% nationally, and modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 17% nationally. On the other side, households without a vehicle resides in the top 8.9% nationally, and poverty is in the top 10.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Crowded housing stands in the top 16% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 14060, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 1.0%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.8–33.6
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.4–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.5–11.0
Depression among adults21.9%18.6–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.0–44.8
Obesity among adults36.2%28.9–43.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.3–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.1–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.8–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.3–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%62.9–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%56.4–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%68.8–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%13.9–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.8–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.4–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%31.9–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%18.0–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.7–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.8
Any disability among adults32.5%28.1–36.8
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.5–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.2–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.5–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.6–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.4–18.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.2–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)13.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle13.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription83.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age41.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$60,270$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$104,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$841$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured