Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14468

in Hilton, New YorkPopulation 18,526

59.87/ 100

Ranked #4,952 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #620 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #36 of 101 Rochester, NY ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

18.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.7%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Hilton, New York (ZIP 14468) ranks in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,952nd) and the top 36% of New York (620th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Modeled uninsured settles in the bottom 4.8% nationally, colon screening resides in the top 13.2% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the bottom 15% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 18% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 18% nationally. Set against that, modeled arsenic lies in the top 7.5% nationally, and lead in tap water lands in the top 17% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 14559, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rochester, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.7–32.6
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.8–37.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.5
Depression among adults22.8%20.0–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.6–39.7
Obesity among adults30.5%26.1–35.2
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.2–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%4.0–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.0–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.1–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.4%89.1–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.6–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.4–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.8–83.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.8%20.6–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%30.3–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.4–17.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%11.9–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Any disability among adults26.6%23.6–29.9
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.4–24.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.0–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.8–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription93.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate85.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$98,693$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$230,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,300$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured