Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14466

in Hemlock, New YorkPopulation 1,754

59.20/ 100

Ranked #5,444 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #676 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #39 of 101 Rochester, NY ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

99.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.7%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.6%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.4 pCi/L

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hemlock, New York (ZIP 14466) ranks in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,444th) and the top 39% of New York (676th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription stands in the top 5.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Poverty resides in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening resides in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography sits in the top 8.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic resides in the top 7.2% nationally.

For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 14471, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rochester, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.8–32.1
High blood pressure among adults34.0%31.0–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.1–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.0%10.1–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Depression among adults20.9%18.5–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.8–41.1
Obesity among adults31.9%26.9–37.2
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.7–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%3.8–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.2–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.4–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.4–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.0%70.0–76.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.0%66.6–71.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.6%76.3–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.8–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.9%11.0–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%18.4–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%32.3–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.8–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Any disability among adults25.4%22.4–28.4
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%19.2–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.8–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–7.0
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.9–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate94.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households54.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age51.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$108,085$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$213,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$779$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured