ZIP code
13082
in Kirkville, New YorkPopulation 4,314
58.78/ 100
Ranked #5,763 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)
Ranked #712 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 41%)
Ranked #28 of 87 Syracuse, NY ZIPs (top 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Lead in tap water
7 ppb
in the top 6.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
US94thDefinition & source ›
The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.
Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
63.5%
in the top 6.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
1.7%
in the top 9.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
4.7%
in the bottom 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Kirkville, New York (ZIP 13082) lands in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,763rd) and the top 41% of New York (712th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation lands in the top 11.6% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 13.2% nationally. Modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 14.7% nationally, uninsured rests in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and colon screening is in the top 12.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, lead in tap water settles in the top 6.1% nationally, modeled pfas lies in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 9.4% nationally.
Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 13039, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Syracuse, NY metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 73%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 93%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 65%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 73%
8%
Disability
healthier than 79%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 82%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 60%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 58%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 48%
14%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 71%
13%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 57%
11%
Disability
healthier than 52%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 54%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 50%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 39%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 31%
8%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 64%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
Disability
healthier than 62%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 53%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 56%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 53%
11%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 32%
14%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13030
New Yorkshares a border
Score 58.34
Closest healthier
13039
New Yorkshares a border
Score 62.50
Similar health profile
14075
New York99% similar profile
Score 62.90
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.0% | 27.5–32.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 35.7% | 32.9–38.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.6% | 9.8–11.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 10.0–11.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.7% | 6.1–7.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.0% | 6.2–7.9 |
| Depression among adults | 21.1% | 18.8–23.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.5% | 9.3–11.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 39.0% | 36.0–42.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.4% | 31.6–41.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.4% | 3.1–3.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.6% | 7.3–10.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.7% | 4.0–5.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.5% | 77.3–81.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.2% | 80.0–84.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.7% | 89.6–91.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 71.6% | 68.3–74.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 66.7% | 64.0–69.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.0% | 74.1–83.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.9% | 14.8–19.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.4% | 10.7–14.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.2% | 19.2–25.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.9% | 31.7–40.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.4% | 13.6–17.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.6% | 14.1–17.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.3% | 12.0–14.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.7% | 10.4–13.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 27.2% | 24.3–30.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.5% | 5.8–7.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.4–8.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.0% | 11.6–14.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.3% | 3.0–3.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.6–4.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.5% | 19.9–25.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.5–11.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 7.3–10.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 8.1–10.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 5.3–6.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.2% | 27.8–35.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.6% | 4.9–6.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 7.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 4.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 30.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.6% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 16.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 92.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 51.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 22.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 44.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $82,964 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $185,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | $631 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured