Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

13648

in Harrisville, New YorkPopulation 2,236

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

50.64/ 100

Ranked #15,357 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #1,397 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.4%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

31.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

41.9%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.7%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.8%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Harrisville, New York (ZIP 13648), by its composite score, sits in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,357th) and the bottom 19% of New York (1,397th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: pharmacy registers in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation lies in the top 11.4% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, slow internet speeds resides in the top 7.2% nationally, walkability is in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 12.3% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the top 13.4% nationally, and distance to a nursing home registers in the top 16% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 13327, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%30.4–35.5
High blood pressure among adults38.7%35.9–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.7–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.4–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.6
Depression among adults21.9%19.7–24.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.5–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%37.3–43.5
Obesity among adults41.9%37.3–47.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.7–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.2–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.7–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.9–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.8–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%64.5–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.3%59.7–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%71.9–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%15.0–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.9–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%25.4–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%32.1–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.5–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.5–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.5
Any disability among adults31.3%28.2–35.0
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.0%14.2–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%20.7–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.8–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.7–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.9–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Loneliness among adults32.4%28.8–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–649.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate87.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age46.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$60,735$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$118,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$872$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.4 yr ± 1.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.51 years of 85.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured