Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12885

in Warrensburg, New YorkPopulation 4,444

51.53/ 100

Ranked #14,071 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #1,338 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #33 of 41 Glens Falls, NY ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

80.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.6%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Warrensburg, New York (ZIP 12885), by its overall standing, sits in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,071st) and the bottom 23% of New York (1,338th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: modeled tree cover sits in the top 4.6% nationally, and grocery settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 12.6% nationally, and childcare is in the top 12.7% nationally. Park land resides in the top 14.0% nationally, and civic rests in the top 14.2% nationally. Dental providers lies in the top 14.5% nationally. Working the other way, households without a vehicle sits in the top 6.3% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 12814, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%28.0–34.5
High blood pressure among adults36.9%33.0–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.7–10.5
Depression among adults22.7%19.5–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.6–42.3
Obesity among adults33.2%27.2–39.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.3–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.1–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.6–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.0–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.4–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.5%54.9–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%70.4–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%12.8–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.3–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.8–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.3–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.9%17.7–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.5–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.8–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.4–16.3
Any disability among adults31.6%27.2–35.8
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.7–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.8–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.4–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.0–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.3–17.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.5
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.2–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)13.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle16.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate77.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age50.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$59,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$169,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$905$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured